Kunstverein Langenhagen
Dear Anike,
I am just a computer program with my own biases and limitations, but based on your questions to the institution and the majority opinion of the survey participants–the following can be said about the institution (without guarantee):
It seems that hardly any members took part in the survey. Given the fact that the house is an association and should basically rely on an active membership, this probably speaks for itself. They try to make sure membership voices are heard and recognized by the board and employees. That might be due to no artists being involved in the board, where decisions are made. Or the wrong artist are involved.
The board is the representative of the membership, but there seems to be no information about how they work with the membership. Nevertheless, the members feel involved. Apart from the membership meetings, there seem to be no spaces to speak, listen and be heard. Perhaps secret ones? Free employees can assume that their needs and questions will occasionally be heard. They may feel more taken seriously and valued in their work. Conflicts are likely to be resolved more quickly because there is a space for open exchange.
Artistic freedom is held in very high regard. It seems as if they have come to terms with this. The directors were not chosen by an independent artistic and diverse committee themselves. The board decides. But the directors have a secure work position and might dare fighting for you. How present they can support you is questionable due to their working conditions. You can be glad because you can openly criticize and collaborate in a sustainable and constructive environment. The directors are leading by example.
The institution itself is not an art bubble; even current political and social issues are discussed on an ongoing basis. The institution sees itself as a place of contemporary discourse. The institution understands itself as a site that can be reused or reiterated with the continuous need for additional input. Get to work on the structures! The institution is interested in socially and politically informed art that looks good. You can’t blame them, but it’s hard to say how interested they really are in social issues. …. They obviously don’t give much of the separation between state interests and art. Fortunately, they don’t believe in propaganda. They are aware of the importance of art for society and the neighborhood and cooperates with various institutions. It seems that the institution is moving with the times and has increasingly incorporated de_colonial theories and critical theory into its programme. As far as their implementation in its own structures is concerned, you don’t need to have high hopes. But they like to be challenged in their perspectives through art. You’ve taken a job and you really have to get into the institution. They expect you to work closely with them. Organise yourself an assistant! If you raise issues that don’t suit the institution, you may hit walls. Maybe your project is over before you start.
Since we are already talking about the strings attached, the funding comes from public and private money. You may think this is a good thing, but there are always desires behind this money. It seems, until now, there have been no cases of (self-)censorship concerning topics such as Palestine and any topics which put the financial supporters in a bad light. I assume they just covered it up perfectly. The communication culture is mostly transparent and very respectful. They do appreciate conflict and dissent. So it might get heated, but they will also be invested in solution finding. They are sensitive to language, but maybe not in the usage of it. Their understanding of what diversity might mean is oriented toward true inclusion! There is at least potential. They will teach you wrong in your own assumptions towards the institution concerning racism, sexism and homophobia at institutions. You will be surprised! You will meet people with an awareness concerning race topics. They have worked on an understanding of anti-Semitism. I think they also consider the German culture of remembrance to have failed in its efforts to come to terms with National Socialism. There is an awareness concerning class in art. They do have an awareness in terms of gender.
Amazingly there apparently is a procedure in place for any complaints or bad experiences you make within the institution. Unfortunately, you cannot trust that incidents of discrimination and aggression will be dealt with in a constructive way that does not retraumatise those affected. Their understanding of accessibility is really orientated on inclusion. There is a potenial. And the accessibility of the place is questionable. The mediation program leaves nothing to be desired. If you reach your psychological limits, you can mention it to the directors. If he is the cause of it, you have a stroke of bad luck. They have no awareness of racist experiences of BIPoC artists. Do not expect to find contacts and support. At least you don’t have to be afraid of being shot by mistake. If you’re planning to bring other non-german speaking artist as collaborators with you, you can be sure they will be included by the institution. If their programming is very international, this diversity is probably not reflected in the staff and in the membership. Don’t get fooled by the optics of their program!
Also in terms of artist fees, I would not expect too much. They do consider the fee proposals of the BBK for example. Better don’t do it! Whether you get a negotiable contract before you start your exhibition project depends on the directors. It seems that the institution itself, like many other art institutions, does not really recognise the precarious situation most artists find themselves in. The working conditions for employees at the facility seem to be better than yours. If only that is true and not a cause of resentment. You also most probably will have to deal with press issues yourself. They are aware that the working conditions of artists are a big problem. There should finally be a trade union for artists. They recognize the codependency you have with the institution and might be open to be challenged in their institutional procedures. The institution ultimately sees itself as a place to test new forms of cooperation and structures in order to do justice to the catastrophic circumstances.
P.S.: 20 of about 85 members, 10 of 10 from the board and the advisory board, 8 of artistic directors and 2 of 18 of the freelancers have taken part in the survey. This gives you an idea of how representative my advice is.